Startling News from the R. Kelly trial
According to nydailynews:
The body of evidence in the R.Kelly kiddie-porn case could come down to this: a mole on the R&B raunchmeister’s back.
During opening arguments in his sex-tape trial Tuesday, the defense said the singer couldn’t possibly be the man who cavorted with a girl as young as 13.
Kelly, 41, has a “significant” mole on his lower middle back, one that’s been there since childhood, said lawyer Sam Adam Jr.
And the man seen performing a variety of explicit sex acts on the raw video made between 1998 and 2000?
“There is no mole on his back,” Adam told jurors in a packed Chicago courtroom.
Wow. You’d think with a bombshell like this R. Kelly would have rushed to the courtroom a lot sooner than 5 years. You don’t think R. Kelly supposed mole is homemade, do you? Say-with a Sharpie? 
